skip to primary navigationskip to content
 

Part II

The Part II course in History and Philosophy of Science (HPS) gives students an insight into the historical development of science, medicine and technology. It addresses questions about the nature of scientific knowledge, and critically examines the social authority given to scientific expertise. It thus provides essential intellectual resources for understanding some of the most important aspects of modern society and culture.

This is a full-time Part II course in the Natural Sciences Tripos. We also offer single-paper options as part of the NST Part II course in Biological and Biomedical Sciences, Part IIB of the Human, Social and Political Sciences Tripos, and Part IIB of the Psychological and Behavioural Sciences Tripos.

Options

There are two alternative ways of designing your HPS Part II programme.

Option A consists of:

  • three unseen written examinations chosen from a broad range of papers
  • a dissertation;
  • two primary source essays.

Option B consists of:

  • four unseen written examinations chosen from a broad range of papers;
  • two primary source essays.

Each examination paper counts for 20%, the two primary source essays for 20% and the dissertation (in Option A) for 20% of the overall mark. This means that Option A is 40% coursework and Option B is 20% coursework.

The papers

Students choose from the following list of papers. Any combination of papers will provide a very broad exposure to the field of history and philosophy of science and medicine and will fully meet the course aims and objectives.

  • Paper 1: Early History of Science, Medicine and Technology
  • Paper 2: Sciences and Empires (1780–present)
  • Paper 3: Modern Medicine and Life Sciences (1780–present)
  • Paper 4: Philosophy and Scientific Practice
  • Paper 5: Epistemology and Metaphysics of Science
  • Paper 6: Ethics and Politics of Science, Technology and Medicine

Primary sources

All students write two extended essays (up to 3,000 words), each focused on an assigned primary source. During Michaelmas Term there will be six series of primary source seminars, each made up of four seminars. Students should attend four series of seminars. They then choose two sources on which to write their essays.

The prescribed sources for 2018–19 are as follows:

  • Jan van der Straet (Stradanus), Nova Reperta (New Inventions), a series of 20 engravings (c. 1590)
  • The Superconducting Super Collider: Congressional Hearings:
    • Superconducting Super Collider: Hearings Before the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology, United States House of Representatives, 100th Cong. 245 (April 7, 8, and 9, 1987)
    • Department of Energy's Superconducting Super Collider Project: Hearing Before the Subcommittee on Energy Research and Development of the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources, United States Senate, 102nd Cong. (April 16, 1991)
    • Establishing Priorities in Science Funding: Hearing Before the Task Force on Defense, Foreign Policy and Space of the Committee on the Budget, United States House of Representatives, 102nd Cong. 67 (July 11 and 18, 1991)
    • Importance and Status of the Superconducting Super Collider: Joint Hearing Before the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources and the Subcommittee on Energy and Water Development of the Committee on Appropriations, United States Senate, 102nd Cong. 27 (June 30, 1992)
    • Superconducting Super Collider: Joint Hearing Before the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources and the Subcommittee on Energy and Water Development of the Committee on Appropriations, United States Senate, 103rd Cong. (August 4, 1993)
  • National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, PMG19 Addendum A: Final amendments to the NICE technology appraisal processes and methods guides to support the proposed new Cancer Drugs Fund arrangements (2016)
  • The Stanford School:
    • John Dupré, The Disorder of Things: Metaphysical Foundations of the Disunity of Science (Cambridge, MA & London: Harvard University Press, 1993), chapter 10, 'The Disunity of Science', pp. 221–243
    • Ian Hacking, 'Do we see through a microscope?', Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 62 (1981): 305–322; it is also reprinted essentially in the same form as chapter 11 of Hacking's Representing and Intervening
    • Nancy Cartwright, 'Fundamentalism versus the patchwork of laws', chapter 1 of The Dappled World: A Study in Boundaries of Science (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999); previously published in Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 94 (1994): 279–292
  • Hans Reichenbach, The Direction of Time (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1971)
  • Franz Boas, The Mind of Primitive Man (New York: Macmillan, 1911; 2nd ed. 1938)

Dissertation

This part of the course – which is only for students taking Option A – gives students the chance to explore in depth a topic that really interests them. The dissertation is a substantial piece of original work (up to 12,000 words). Students make short presentations on their dissertation work in dissertation seminars in Lent Term.

Supervisions

All papers are supported by supervisions; we recommend that students write 6–8 supervision essays per paper.